![]() ![]() Yes, if you look at the raw power of the SOC’s the PI4 would come out on top but then for a product that is newer in generation, should be something to be expected, although not IMO with a major jump in performance that knocks my socks off.īottom line being, forget about SOC comparison unless there is either something very specific that make a difference to your needs or that one id so far ahead of the other that an instant purchase is almost inevitable. There is no doubt that over a year later the PI4 has come along and the range of distros is improving dramatically but I still would not consider one myself, when I factor in the real cost of a PI4 setup against my own personal needs, the AML platform and CE does the job nicely. ![]() The X3 is of course more powerful than the X2 but not by that significant a distance that it made it a must have at the time of consideration and because the RPI4 had to be overclocked to match the performance of the X3 meant that the gap between 2 and 3 reduced even further for an OOB comparison. When the PI 4 first came out I was initially reaching for my wallet because the specs looked great but on closer inspection, the fact that you really did need to add some form of cooling, which added to the cost, then reading about how out of the box 4K playback was astonishingly poor quickly lead me to dismiss the PI4 and go for an S905X2 and I’m glad that I made that decision. Now this is a discussion that could go on and on but I can keep my view relatively short based upon a comment that was made on a review of an S905X3 box in terms of gaming, wherein the reviewer stated that the S905X3 was on par with an overclocked Raspberry PI 4.įrom a video playback perspective, which I think is most peoples key use for AMLogic boxes with CE, the Raspberry PI is woefully behind in performance, especially when it comes to 4K. HXWS HX S905 Series ARM Amlogic 2016 MHz (4 cores) Android 32-bit 507 1328 Sun, 01:06:19 +0000: amlogic S905.5 ARM Amlogic 2016 MHz (4 cores) Android 32-bit 639 1705 Sat, 09:06:04 +0000: amlogic S905.5 ARM Amlogic 2016 MHz (4 cores) Android 32-bit 650 1398 Wed, 09:21:39 +0000: amlogic S905.5 ARM Amlogic 2016. The table below makes it possible to observe well the lithography, the number of transistors (if present), the offered cache memory, the. The SC X2+ compares with entry level Android TV boxes and uses the L variant of the s905 processor. ![]() The charted value is the total compression MIPS score. Technical specifications and performance with the benchmarks of the Amlogic S905X4-B processor dedicated to the tv box sector, it has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.0GHz. The rating value is calculated from the measured CPU speed and it is normalized with Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 (2.4 GHz, 4 MB L2) CPU in 64-bit Windows with multi-threading option switched off. Whilst it is very common to compare the performance of one SOC against another when considering a purchase, the SOC is only one hardware component that contributes towards the overall performance. Results are shown as a rating in MIPS (million instructions per second). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |